DeveloperApplication-CoreDev

Differences between revisions 13 and 37 (spanning 24 versions)
Revision 13 as of 2009-10-19 01:28:38
Size: 2363
Editor: 99-21-107-94
Comment:
Revision 37 as of 2016-06-22 18:22:43
Size: 4833
Editor: juliank
Comment: fix -for upload rights- for core-dev
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
## page was renamed from JulianAndresKlode/DeveloperApplication-PPU
## page was renamed from JulianAndresKlode/DeveloperApplication-PPU2
## page was copied from UbuntuDevelopment/DeveloperApplicationTemplate
Line 4: Line 7:
----
'''Please do not edit this page. It is a template to be used by people applying as an Ubuntu developer.'''
'''I, Julian Andres Klode, apply for core-dev.'''
Line 7: Line 9:
Head over to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/YourName/YourDeveloperApplication instead and make use of this template.
----




'''I, <YOUR NAME>, apply for <universe-contributor|MOTU|core-dev|upload rights for package(s) <X>>.'''

|| '''Name''' || <YOUR NAME> ||
|| '''Launchpad Page''' || <link to your launchpad page> ||
|| '''Wiki Page''' || <link to your Wiki page> ||
|| '''Name''' || Julian ||
|| '''Launchpad Page''' || https://launchpad.net/~juliank ||
|| '''Wiki Page''' || [[JulianAndresKlode]] ||
Line 20: Line 14:
''Tell us a bit about yourself.'' I am a Debian Developer involved in / sometimes leading python-apt development. I have developed dh-autoreconf and hardlink and maintain various other packages in Debian. I'm also working on APT, and currently am the one doing the releases and maintaining the xenial branch.
Line 23: Line 17:
''Tell us how and when you got involved, what you liked working on and what you could probably do better.''
Line 26: Line 19:

I started using Ubuntu productively in 2006, and since then have contributed to Ubuntu mostly through fixing bugs in Debian and by syncing them in Ubuntu.

I am an Ubuntu member, and recently also a member of Ubuntu bug control.
Line 27: Line 25:

Porting python-apt to Python 3, writing dh-autoreconf, and improving APT: SHA1 deprecation, fetcher sandboxing, new pinning engine, and other stuff.
Line 28: Line 29:
''Let us know what you worked on, with which development teams / developers you cooperated and how it worked out.''
## As a per-package uploader, please give us some insight into the package maintenance and bug situation since you're working on it.

I mostly work on APT right now, but I also maintain several other packages in Debian and also work on APT reverse dependencies from time to time. I've worked a lot with mvo, and a lot of different people helped me sponsor uploads and APT SRUs.

I'm also involved in hplip packaging on the Debian side, which is kind of weird and partially non-free right now.

I also maintain various small utilities, the best known is dh-autoreconf which recently became a dependency of debhelper itself.
Line 33: Line 38:
I'd like to have more time to fix bugs and improve my software, but university keeps me busy, so I only have time sporadically.
Line 35: Line 42:

I plan to bring support for aptitude patterns to APT and introduce seccomp sandboxing for fetchers. Some of those changes probably require changes in reverse dependencies. I'm also interested in adding an AppArmor layer to our sandboxing, but have not checked yet if that makes sense.

Obviously, I also plan to fix a lot of bugs and upload a lot of new APT releases.

I also hope to get the hplip packaging in a sane state copyright wise (it's synced).
Line 36: Line 50:
''Please describe what you like least in Ubuntu and what thoughts do you have about fixing it.''
Bugs are annoying. Let us fix them!
Line 46: Line 62:
== mvo ==
=== General feedback ===
I worked with Julian for a couple of year, first on python-apt, then on apt itself. His work is always high quality and he has a good judgement. I trust Julian that he will do a good job maintaining apt/python-apt. I'm sure he will also do a good job with the others fwiw, its just that all my work with him was centered around apt/python-apt :)


== xnox ==
Please grant JulianK Ubuntu Core Developer rights, he knows what he is doing. Anything else would be silly, given that he effectively lands apt into Ubuntu already anyway.

{{{
<xnox> rbasak, the list of PPU packages he requests are fine. However, he also finds things and fixes bugs in other dependant packages, and is capable of being an effective core dev =)
* xnox wants juliank as a core dev, cause he would be a good core dev =)
<rbasak> The first part of that reason is a good reason. The second part is a good endorsement but not in itself a reason :)
<rbasak> Please put your reasons in your endorsement ;)
}}}

== Martin Pitt ==
I've followed Julian's work for a long time now. I fully trust his very capable skills in the world of apt and related packages, and he is very enthusiastic and engaged to fix things in Ubuntu as well. He also knows about our release process and freezes and coordinates updates accordingly. I fully support and recommend granting PPU rights -- in fact, I also fully support him becoming a full core developer.
Line 61: Line 94:
## Uncomment the one that applies for you and please remove the others.
##
## [[CategoryCoreDevApplication]]
## [[CategoryMOTUApplication]]
## [[CategoryUniverseContributorApplication]]
## [[CategoryPerPackageUploaderApplication]]
[[CategoryCoreDevApplication]]

I, Julian Andres Klode, apply for core-dev.

Name

Julian

Launchpad Page

https://launchpad.net/~juliank

Wiki Page

JulianAndresKlode

Who I am

I am a Debian Developer involved in / sometimes leading python-apt development. I have developed dh-autoreconf and hardlink and maintain various other packages in Debian. I'm also working on APT, and currently am the one doing the releases and maintaining the xenial branch.

My Ubuntu story

My involvement

I started using Ubuntu productively in 2006, and since then have contributed to Ubuntu mostly through fixing bugs in Debian and by syncing them in Ubuntu.

I am an Ubuntu member, and recently also a member of Ubuntu bug control.

Examples of my work / Things I'm proud of

Porting python-apt to Python 3, writing dh-autoreconf, and improving APT: SHA1 deprecation, fetcher sandboxing, new pinning engine, and other stuff.

Areas of work

I mostly work on APT right now, but I also maintain several other packages in Debian and also work on APT reverse dependencies from time to time. I've worked a lot with mvo, and a lot of different people helped me sponsor uploads and APT SRUs.

I'm also involved in hplip packaging on the Debian side, which is kind of weird and partially non-free right now.

I also maintain various small utilities, the best known is dh-autoreconf which recently became a dependency of debhelper itself.

Things I could do better

I'd like to have more time to fix bugs and improve my software, but university keeps me busy, so I only have time sporadically.

Plans for the future

General

I plan to bring support for aptitude patterns to APT and introduce seccomp sandboxing for fetchers. Some of those changes probably require changes in reverse dependencies. I'm also interested in adding an AppArmor layer to our sandboxing, but have not checked yet if that makes sense.

Obviously, I also plan to fix a lot of bugs and upload a lot of new APT releases.

I also hope to get the hplip packaging in a sane state copyright wise (it's synced).

What I like least in Ubuntu

Bugs are annoying. Let us fix them!


Comments

If you'd like to comment, but are not the applicant or a sponsor, do it here. Don't forget to sign with @SIG@.


Endorsements

As a sponsor, just copy the template below, fill it out and add it to this section.

mvo

General feedback

I worked with Julian for a couple of year, first on python-apt, then on apt itself. His work is always high quality and he has a good judgement. I trust Julian that he will do a good job maintaining apt/python-apt. I'm sure he will also do a good job with the others fwiw, its just that all my work with him was centered around apt/python-apt Smile :)

xnox

Please grant JulianK Ubuntu Core Developer rights, he knows what he is doing. Anything else would be silly, given that he effectively lands apt into Ubuntu already anyway.

<xnox> rbasak, the list of PPU packages he requests are fine. However, he also finds things and fixes bugs in other dependant packages, and is capable of being an effective core dev =)
* xnox wants juliank as a core dev, cause he would be a good core dev =)
<rbasak> The first part of that reason is a good reason. The second part is a good endorsement but not in itself a reason :)
<rbasak> Please put your reasons in your endorsement ;)

Martin Pitt

I've followed Julian's work for a long time now. I fully trust his very capable skills in the world of apt and related packages, and he is very enthusiastic and engaged to fix things in Ubuntu as well. He also knows about our release process and freezes and coordinates updates accordingly. I fully support and recommend granting PPU rights -- in fact, I also fully support him becoming a full core developer.


TEMPLATE

== <SPONSORS NAME> ==
=== General feedback ===
## Please fill us in on your shared experience. (How many packages did you sponsor? How would you judge the quality? How would you describe the improvements? Do you trust the applicant?)

=== Specific Experiences of working together ===
''Please add good examples of your work together, but also cases that could have handled better.''
=== Areas of Improvement ===


CategoryCoreDevApplication

JulianAndresKlode/DeveloperApplication-CoreDev (last edited 2016-06-22 18:22:43 by juliank)